Mobile LiDAR vehicle surveying a roadway corridor in Alberta

Road Quality Assurance in Alberta

Corridor-scale pavement condition, geometry, and clearance verification powered by mobile LiDAR and profiling systems — serving Alberta, BC, and Saskatchewan from our Calgary base.

Overview

Municipal Provincial Highway Urban Rail Asset Management Construction QA
45+
Years Combined Experience
100+ km
Roads Surveyed
mm-grade
Network IRI Output
3–5 days
Report Turnaround

We measure and verify road condition and geometry using mobile LiDAR, inertial profilers, and panoramic imaging. Our workflows compute IRI/roughness, rutting, crossfall and superelevation, lane and shoulder widths, curb & gutter position, vertical and side clearances, and sight distance — delivered as CAD/GIS layers with a rigorous QC report. For deeper context on what separates strong mobile LiDAR providers, see our Not All LiDAR Services Are Equal article.

Relative Precision
±10–20 mm
Absolute Accuracy
±2–5 cm*
Pavement Density
≥ 500 pts/m²
Capture Mode
Traffic-speed
Imagery
Panoramic/RGB optional

*Depends on GNSS conditions and control/checkpoint strategy.

Mobile LiDAR vs Traditional Pavement Inspection

How modern mobile LiDAR road QA compares to traditional methods.

CapabilityManual WalkProfilometerMobile LiDAR (ours)
Network kilometres / day< 530–60100–300
Operator safetyAt risk in trafficIn-traffic vehicleIn-traffic vehicle
Captures geometry, IRI, defectsLimitedIRI / rutting onlyFull coverage
Re-walk for re-inspectionRequiredRequiredRe-process scan
Best fit forSpot inspectionsHigh-speed IRIEngineering-grade QA

More: Not All LiDAR Services Are Equal.

See real deliverables

Open our Sample Data Portal — preview orthophotos, point clouds & 3D tiles in your browser.

Mobile LiDAR road condition survey
Featured Project

Municipal Road Quality Assurance

Mobile LiDAR road condition survey delivering IRI, rutting, cracking and ride-quality metrics for a municipal network.

View all projects

Metrics & Tests

Ride & Surface

  • IRI/roughness indices (per lane)
  • Rut depth; crossfall/superelevation
  • Texture indicators (LiDAR/imagery-derived)

Geometry & Safety

  • Lane/shoulder widths, curb & gutter, edge drop
  • Vertical/side clearances (bridges, signage, barriers)
  • Sight-distance & envelope checks

Compliance

  • Design tolerance checks vs. alignment
  • Change detection vs. previous surveys
  • Construction lot acceptance (QA/QC)

Deliverables

Core Data

  • Classified point clouds (LAS/LAZ) incl. curb/edge
  • DTM/DSM, contours, slope & hillshade rasters
  • Colorized point clouds and orthophotos (optional)

Engineering Products

  • IRI, rutting, crossfall, width maps (GeoTIFF/SHP)
  • Cross-sections, profiles, and clearance reports
  • Feature extraction: lane lines, signage, barriers, markings

Formats

LAS/LAZ GeoTIFF DWG/DXF SHP/GDB CSV PDF maps

Workflow

  1. Route planning & safety plan; control layout
  2. Acquisition: mobile LiDAR + profilers at traffic speed
  3. Trajectory solution: GNSS/IMU PPK/PPP (SLAM if needed)
  4. Strip alignment: boresight, overlap residuals, bundle adjustment
  5. Cleaning & classification: pavement, curb/edge, obstacles
  6. Computation: IRI, rutting, crossfall, widths, clearances
  7. Packaging: CAD/GIS layers, profiles/sections, maps
  8. QA/QC report: checkpoints, RMSE, density, conformance

Technology

Sensors

  • High-rate multi-return LiDAR (up to ~1M pts/s)
  • Inertial profilers & wheel odometry
  • Panoramic/RGB cameras for inventory & markings

Positioning

  • Tightly coupled GNSS/IMU with PPK/PPP
  • Local control & independent checkpoints
  • SLAM assistance in GNSS-poor areas (as required)

Software

TerraScan LP360 ArcGIS Global Mapper iTwin Custom QA scripts

Frequently Asked Questions

Typically no — vehicle-mounted systems collect at traffic speed following an approved safety plan. We supplement with trolley or backpack mapping in complex or pedestrian areas.
Typical absolute accuracy is ±2–5 cm with relative precision of ±5–10 mm for geometry features, contingent on control quality and environment. Every project ships with a QC report listing accuracy benchmarks against independent control points.
Yes. We support common EPSG codes and custom site grids. Results can be reported by station/offset and compared to design tolerances.
We combine tightly coupled GNSS/IMU with SLAM methods and local control/checkpoints to maintain accuracy. QC reports include residuals and RMSE.

Need objective, corridor-wide QA metrics?

Request a Quote